Differentiator

Multi-model AI routing that can't silently rot.

Multi-model AI routing sends each task to the model best suited for it, falls back when a provider fails, and balances cost against quality — instead of pinning your whole workflow to one model's strengths and one provider's uptime.

Model routing is the decision layer that picks which AI model runs a given task. Good routing turns "which model should I use?" from a hardcoded guess into a rule the platform applies consistently, task by task.

Seven providers, one workflow

A single Prompt Tornado run can use a search-grounded model for research, a reasoning model for analysis, and dedicated models for image or audio — routed across seven providers.

OpenAI

General reasoning & generation

Anthropic

Long-form writing & reasoning

Google

Multimodal & long context

Perplexity

Search-grounded research

Mistral

Fast, cost-efficient tasks

fal.ai

Image generation

ElevenLabs

Audio & voice

+ fallback

Automatic failover between them

How routing decides

Task-type detection
A 181-task intent registry

Each request is classified against a structured catalog of 181 task types across 17 categories, each carrying the signals used to detect it and a recommended model. This keeps routing declarative — the mapping lives in one governed place, not scattered across prompt strings.

Fallback logic
Ordered, and recorded

If the primary model errors, the task retries on an alternative capable model, and the substitution is written into the run trace. Fallbacks recover the run and stay visible — no silent downgrade.

Cost / quality
Set once, applied per task

High-stakes reasoning goes to a top-tier model; cheap, high-volume extraction goes to a fast, inexpensive one. You set the tradeoff at the routing layer instead of re-deciding it in every prompt.

The most dangerous routing bug isn't a crash — it's a workflow that quietly falls back to a weaker model and keeps returning plausible, lower-quality output. Routing that records every substitution makes that visible.
Verified

Routing correctness, measured

In the internal evaluation, routing was checked task by task — did each task reach the correct model for its type.

172/181
Routing checks passed
correct model per task
7
Providers routed across
text · search · image · audio
17
Task categories
181 task types total
$0.0245
Cost of a 3-model run
example workflow

Source: AI Workflow Evaluation · quality_v1 baseline (2026-05-11).

What routing gives you in practice

Frequently asked

How does routing decide which model to use?
By task type. The request is classified against the task-intent registry, and each task type carries a recommended model plus fallbacks, balancing capability and cost.
What happens when the chosen model is down?
The task fails over to the next capable model in the fallback order, and the substitution is written into the run trace so the downgrade is never silent.
Which providers are supported?
OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity, Mistral, fal.ai, and ElevenLabs — spanning text, search, image, and audio.

Route every task to the right model.

Multi-provider fallback and cost-aware routing, with every decision on the record.